Skip to content

The forest is greater than the sum of its parts

February 1, 2017

hidden-life-of-treesThe Hidden Life of Trees was written by a German forester, Peter Wohlleben.  After completion of formal academic training as a forester, he took a government job managing a 3,000 acre public forest.  After 20 years of managing that forest for timber production with chainsaws, bulldozers, and insecticides, he decided about 10 years ago that he could not continue damaging the forest he had fallen in love with.

He resolved to manage a forest for the benefit of the forest, rather than for economic benefit.  In fact, he was able to do both.  The community for which he had been managing its forest for timber, decided to change its mission to forest preservation: “So, 10 years ago, the municipality took a chance. It ended its contract with the state forestry administration, and hired Mr. Wohlleben directly. He brought in horses, eliminated insecticides and began experimenting with letting the woods grow wilder. Within two years, the forest went from loss to profit, in part by eliminating expensive machinery and chemicals.” (1)

The forest educates the forester

In the decades that Mr. Wohlleben has cared for the forest, he has learned a great deal about the trees, and more importantly how the trees function as a community in the forest:  “…in nature, trees operate less like individuals and more as communal beings. Working together in networks and sharing resources, they increase their resistance.” (1)

In The Hidden Life of Trees, Mr. Wohlleben tells us how the trees communicate and share resources in the forest. When foresters interrupt these functions by artificially spacing out the trees, they can disconnect the trees from their networks, depriving them of their natural resilience mechanisms.

How do trees communicate?

Creative Commons. Photo by Steve Garvie.

Creative Commons. Photo by Steve Garvie.

Scent is one of the means of communication between trees.  On the African savannah Acacia trees are one of the favorite food of giraffes.  When the giraffes start munching on the Acacia, the tree pumps a powerful toxin into its leaves that makes it unpalatable to the giraffes.  The scent of that toxin is wafted to neighboring Acacia trees, which triggers them to start pumping that toxin into their leaves, making them unpalatable before the giraffes even get to them.  If the distance between the trees is increased beyond the range of the scent message, the Acacias are unprepared for the giraffes when they arrive after being repelled by the toxic defense of their distant neighbors.

Hope Jahren tells a similar story in Lab Girl about the role of scent in the defense of an entire forest in an infestation of tent caterpillars in a research forest in Washington.  The initial attack of the caterpillars defoliated entire trees and fatally damaged others.  The wounded trees emitted a powerful acid that made the caterpillars sick.  The scent of that acid warned healthy trees a full mile away.  The spread of the caterpillars throughout the forest was halted by this scent message, making the healthy trees equally unpalatable to the caterpillars.

The underground communication and defense system

The roots of trees radiate out from the trunk forming a perimeter of roots that is often twice as big as the canopy.  In the forest, the root systems of neighboring trees often intersect and grow into one another.  The trees in the forest are also connected underground by a web of fungi that connect the roots of a tree to its neighbors.  These connections transmit signals from one tree to the next, “helping the trees exchange news about insects, drought, and other dangers.” (2)

Photosynthesis. Creative Commons

Photosynthesis. Creative Commons

This network of roots and fungi is also how trees share resources in the forest.  Every tree in the forest lives in a slightly different environment such as the nutrients in the soil, the physical composition of the soil, the available light, etc.  Despite these differences in available resources, researchers at the Institute for Environmental Research in Germany discovered that the trees distribute available resources throughout the forest so that every tree was photosynthesizing* at the same rate. That is, every tree in the forest was sharing an equal amount of the sugar produced by photosynthesis:  “Their enormous networks act as gigantic redistribution mechanisms.  It’s a bit like the way social security systems operate to ensure individual members of society don’t fall too far behind.”  (2)  (The scientist who documented this sharing of resources by trees gave a TED talk about her research, which is available HERE.)

Wohlleben’s analogy, suggesting that the sharing economy of the forest is comparable to our social safety net is thought provoking.  Let’s think about it.  Are the trees being generous to their neighbors in the forest by alerting them to dangers and sharing resources with them?  No, because by benefiting their neighbors, the trees also benefit themselves:  “This is because a tree can be only as strong as the forest that surrounds it…Their well-being depends on their community, and when the supposedly feeble trees disappear, the others lose as well.  When that happens, the forest is no longer a single closed unit.  Hot sun and swirling winds can now penetrate to the forest floor and disrupts the moist, cool climate.”  (2)

Challenging the conventional wisdom

If the trees in the forest benefit by being close to one another, why do the local managers of our public lands keep telling us that “thinning” the forest will be good for the forest?  Wohlleben tells us that the conventional wisdom that thinning the forest is good for the trees originates with the timber industry:  “In commercial forests, trees are supposed to grow thick trunks and be harvest ready as quickly as possible.  And to do that, they need a lot of space and large, symmetrical, rounded crowns.  In regular five-year cycles, any supposed competition is cut down so that the remaining trees are free to grow.  Because these trees will never grow old—they are destined for the sawmill when they are only about a hundred [in Germany]—the negative effects of this management practice are barely noticeable.”  (2)

Our urban forest is not “destined for the sawmill,” so thinning the urban forest does not benefit either the trees that remain or the forest as a whole.  The “thinning” strategy being used by the managers of our public lands is damaging both the forest and the environment:

  • The trees that remain are damaged by the pesticides that are used to kill the roots of their neighbors when they are destroyed. The pesticides that are sprayed on the stumps of the destroyed trees kill the roots of the tree and also travel through the interconnected root systems to damage the trees that remain.
  • The trees that remain are subjected to more wind when their neighbors are destroyed, which increases the potential for windthrow and therefore public safety hazards.
  • The forest is less capable of retaining moisture when shade is reduced, which also stresses the trees that remain.
  • Valuable habitat for wildlife is lost when trees are destroyed.

The Hidden Life of Trees informs us that the forest is greater than the sum of its parts.  Every tree contributes to forest health just as every member of society contributes to the well-being of our communities.


*Photosynthesis is the process used by plants to convert light energy into chemical energy that is stored in carbohydrate molecules, such as sugars.  The sugars are the fuel that enable plants to live and grow.  (Wikipedia)

  1. “German Forest Ranger Finds That Trees Have Social Networks, Too,” New York Times, January 29, 2016. 
  2. Peter Wohlleben, The Hidden Life of Trees: What They Feel, How They Communicate, Greystone Book, 2016 (originally published in German in 2015)
3 Comments leave one →
  1. February 1, 2017 2:57 pm

    That is a brilliant explanation about why thinning trees became accepted as good, when it’s not good for the trees killed, their community, the animals who live with them, and even the capacity of the earth to hold water in rain.

    No mention of the damage done by the machinery brought in to kill and remove trees. The logging destruction in the East Bay is a likely explanation for why we do not have the same numbers of wildflower and other plant species in past logging areas, unlike in Marin.

    As much as “Question Authority” has been popular on bumper stickers, almost no one does it. I first questioned about why should trees be thinned when it’s more interference in nature and it means killing some. It’s as if humans just HAVE to do something to nature, to mark a forest as their territory, and to even kill yet more nature. I keep thinking humans need to let the trees and animals teach us. Do they want to be killed? Do they want to have their habitat damaged or destroyed?

    The dense forest is much better for everyone, for the oxygen all life needs, as well as making forest fire much less likely by restricting wind flow.

Trackbacks

  1. Why “Thinning” Damages a Forest | Save Mount Sutro Forest
  2. Censoring Our Minds and The Power of Naming | Working Class Radical Feminism by Bev Jo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: